EMEQ vs VXUS
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, EMEQ or VXUS?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMEQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMEQ | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $633M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 66 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +61.85%Best | +14.49% |
| 1Y Return | +94.86%Best | +21.52% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.4% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $27,739Best | $14,740 |
| Fund Family | Macquarie Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2 years).
EMEQ vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
EMEQ vs VXUS Performance
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) is an ETF from Macquarie Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMEQ returned +94.86% while VXUS returned +21.52%. Year to date, EMEQ is up 61.85% versus a gain of 14.49% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 12.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for EMEQ and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMEQ charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMEQ currently yields 1.71% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 49.8% of EMEQ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
29 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in EMEQ and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 66 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMEQ | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 402340:KRSk Square Co., Ltd. | 12.34% | 0.14% | 12.20% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 8.48% | 1.41% | 7.07% |
| REL:LNReliance Inds-Spons GDR 144A | 4.52% | 0.14% | 4.38% |
| 028260:KRSamsung C&T Corp | 4.47% | 0.04% | 4.43% |
| 2454:TWMediatek, Inc. | 3.29% | 0.35% | 2.94% |
| 2317:TWHon Hai Precision Industry Co | 2.12% | 0.21% | 1.91% |
| 0388:HKHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited Shs | 1.18% | 0.14% | 1.04% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc | 1.01% | 0.21% | 0.80% |
| GFNORTEO:MXGrupo Financiero Banorte Sab De Cv | 1.11% | 0.08% | 1.03% |
| PUBM:MYPublic Bank Bhd | 1.01% | 0.04% | 0.97% |
49.8% of EMEQ is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMEQ or VXUS?
EMEQ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMEQ or VXUS?
Over the past year EMEQ returned +94.86% vs +21.52% for VXUS, so EMEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EMEQ annualized +66.55% vs +21.41% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMEQ or VXUS?
EMEQ has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 12.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMEQ -26.3% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both EMEQ and VXUS?
EMEQ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMEQ and VXUS?
At least 49.8% of EMEQ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in EMEQ and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMEQ or VXUS?
EMEQ yields 1.71% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than EMEQ?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMEQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.