EMF vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: EMFMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEMFVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio1.50%0.05%
AUM$6,444.06$156.5B
Dividend Yield6.49%2.60%
Holdings1008,747
YTD Return+29.61%+14.57%
1Y Return+59.22%+27.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+31.63%+19.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.36%+9.28%
Volatility (annualized)29.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-73.7%-39.9%
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 27, 1987Jan 26, 2011

EMF vs VXUS Performance

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMF returned +59.22% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, EMF is up 29.61% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.

Over three years, EMF compounded at +31.63% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.36% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EMF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.7% for EMF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EMF charges 1.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $5 annually, a gap of $145 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMF currently yields 6.49% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

7.6%overlap

EMF and VXUS share 51 holdings out of 7895 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EMFWeight in VXUSDifference
2330:TW16.00%3.41%12.59%
000660:KR8.67%0.90%7.77%
PRX:AS3.27%0.14%3.13%
9988:HKProProPro
0700:KYProProPro
005380:KRProProPro
2454:TWProProPro
ICICIBANK:MBProProPro
GFNORTEO:MXProProPro
2317:TWProProPro
See all 10 holdings EMF shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EMF or VXUS?

EMF has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $145 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EMF or VXUS?

Over the past year EMF returned +59.22% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so EMF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EMF annualized +1.78% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EMF or VXUS?

EMF has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMF -73.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both EMF and VXUS?

EMF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between EMF and VXUS?

EMF and VXUS share 51 common holdings with a 7.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7895 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EMF or VXUS?

EMF yields 6.49% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so EMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →