EMIF vs IVV
EMIF vs IVV
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMIF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.61% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.70% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.25% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | May 15, 2000 |
EMIF vs IVV Performance
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMIF returned +10.70% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, EMIF is down 0.61% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EMIF compounded at +11.25% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.57% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.6% for EMIF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMIF charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMIF currently yields 4.22% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMIF and IVV share 1 holdings out of 534 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMIF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.11% | 0.15% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMIF or IVV?
EMIF has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMIF or IVV?
Over the past year EMIF returned +10.70% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), EMIF annualized +1.53% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMIF or IVV?
EMIF has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMIF -54.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMIF and IVV?
EMIF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMIF and IVV?
EMIF and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 534 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMIF or IVV?
EMIF yields 4.22% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EMIF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.