EMIF vs VOO
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMIF or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMIF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.25% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 47 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +0.49% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.17% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.09% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.6% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,818 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.9% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 17, 2026 (16 years).
EMIF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMIF vs VOO Performance
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMIF returned +6.17% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, EMIF is up 0.49% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, EMIF compounded at +12.11% per year against +21.25% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.09% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.38% annualized vs +0.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.6% for EMIF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMIF charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMIF currently yields 4.25% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 30 holdings in EMIF and 494 in VOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in EMIF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 47 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EMIF (99.2% of the fund), and 3 for EMIF that do not appear in VOO (7.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMIF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMIF or VOO?
EMIF has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMIF or VOO?
Over the past year EMIF returned +6.17% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EMIF annualized +0.30% vs +13.38% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMIF or VOO?
EMIF has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMIF -54.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMIF and VOO?
EMIF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMIF or VOO?
EMIF yields 4.25% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EMIF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EMIF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.