EMM vs VTI
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +25.94% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.68% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.57% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
EMM vs VTI Performance
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMM returned +44.68% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, EMM is up 25.94% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, EMM compounded at +20.57% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, EMM has the edge at +19.07% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.0% for EMM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMM charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMM currently yields 0.73% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2827 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMM or VTI?
EMM has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMM or VTI?
Over the past year EMM returned +44.68% vs +22.19% for VTI, so EMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), EMM annualized +19.07% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMM or VTI?
EMM has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMM -22.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMM and VTI?
EMM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMM and VTI?
EMM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2827 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMM or VTI?
EMM yields 0.73% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.