ENHI vs IVV

ENHI vs IVV

Which is better, ENHI or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. ENHI is less concentrated, with 14.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: ENHI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricENHIIVV
Expense Ratio0.27%0.03%Best
AUM$22M$876.4B
Dividend Yield1.15%1.06%
Holdings635508
YTD Return+12.93%Best+12.51%
1Y Return-+17.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight14.9%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 10, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ENHI vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ENHI vs IVV Performance

iShares Enhanced International Active ETF (ENHI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ENHI is up 12.93% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ENHI charges 0.27% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENHI currently yields 1.15% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

ENHI already in IVV2.9%
IVV already in ENHI0.9%

2.9% of ENHI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.9% of IVV's money is in holdings ENHI also owns.

ENHI and IVV share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 614 positions we hold weights for in ENHI and 505 in IVV, against full books of 635 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ENHI (98.5% of the fund), and 11 for ENHI that do not appear in IVV (2.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ENHIWeight in IVVDifference
ROPRoper Technologies Inc.1.50%0.06%1.44%
XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares0.73%0.18%0.55%
MRKMerck & Co. Inc.0.14%0.48%0.34%
DGDollar General Corp.0.32%0.04%0.28%
EQTEqt Corp0.10%0.05%0.05%
UMG:ASUniversal Music Group N.V. Universal Music Group N V0.07%0.06%0.01%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ENHI and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ENHIIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ENHI or IVV?

ENHI has an expense ratio of 0.27% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ENHI and IVV?

2.9% of ENHI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.9% of IVV's is in holdings ENHI also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 614 positions we hold weights for in ENHI and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ENHI or IVV?

ENHI yields 1.15% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ENHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than ENHI?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. ENHI is less concentrated, with 14.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.