ENOR vs VOO

ENOR vs VOO

Which is better, ENOR or VOO?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. ENOR led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.2%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricENORVOO
Expense Ratio0.53%0.03%Best
AUM$91M$997.4B
Dividend Yield4.98%1.04%
Holdings66509
YTD Return+24.95%Best+12.37%
1Y Return+27.80%Best+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.07%+21.37%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.66%+13.49%Best
Volatility (annualized)28.6%14.0%Best
Max Drawdown-70.2%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,858$18,827Best
Top 10 Weight58.2%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 23, 2012Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2012 to Sep 18, 2026 (14.7 years).

ENOR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.7 years both funds cover.

ENOR vs VOO Performance

iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ENOR returned +27.80% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, ENOR is up 24.95% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Over three years, ENOR compounded at +20.07% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.66% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.40% annualized vs +5.80%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ENOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.6% compared with 14.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.2% for ENOR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ENOR charges 0.53% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $3 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENOR currently yields 4.98% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 59 holdings in ENOR and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.8% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in ENOR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 66 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ENOR (99.2% of the fund), and 2 for ENOR that do not appear in VOO (2.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ENOR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ENORVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ENOR or VOO?

ENOR has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ENOR or VOO?

Over the past year ENOR returned +27.80% vs +16.61% for VOO, so ENOR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), ENOR annualized +5.80% vs +13.40% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ENOR or VOO?

ENOR has been the more volatile fund at 28.6% annualized versus 14.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ENOR -70.2% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both ENOR and VOO?

ENOR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ENOR or VOO?

ENOR yields 4.98% while VOO yields 1.04%, so ENOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ENOR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. ENOR led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.