ENOR vs VXUS
iShares MSCI Norway ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. ENOR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENOR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $87M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.32% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +24.89% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.15% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.56% | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.67% | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 23, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ENOR vs VXUS Performance
iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ENOR returned +31.15% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, ENOR is up 24.89% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Over three years, ENOR compounded at +21.56% per year against +20.35% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.67% and +9.40% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, ENOR has the edge at +5.82% annualized vs +4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.2% for ENOR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENOR charges 0.53% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $5 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENOR currently yields 5.32% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ENOR and VXUS share 36 holdings out of 7894 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENOR or VXUS?
ENOR has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ENOR or VXUS?
Over the past year ENOR returned +31.15% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so ENOR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), ENOR annualized +5.82% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ENOR or VXUS?
ENOR has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ENOR -70.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ENOR and VXUS?
ENOR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ENOR and VXUS?
ENOR and VXUS share 36 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENOR or VXUS?
ENOR yields 5.32% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so ENOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.