ENRG vs QQQ
Ninepoint North American Energy Independence ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ENRG or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. ENRG is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENRG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 48 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -5.16% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6%Best | 46.9% |
| Fund Family | Ninepoint Partners LP (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ENRG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ENRG vs QQQ Performance
Ninepoint North American Energy Independence ETF (ENRG) is an ETF from Ninepoint Partners LP (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ENRG is down 5.16% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENRG charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENRG currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
2.6% of ENRG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ENRG also owns.
ENRG and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ENRG and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 48 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ENRG (97.0% of the fund), and 22 for ENRG that do not appear in QQQ (60.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENRG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 2.64% | 0.23% | 2.41% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ENRG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENRG or QQQ?
ENRG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ENRG and QQQ?
2.6% of ENRG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's is in holdings ENRG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ENRG and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENRG or QQQ?
ENRG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ENRG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. ENRG is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.