ENRG vs SCHD

ENRG vs SCHD

Which is better, ENRG or SCHD?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. ENRG is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns (1Y): SCHDLess Concentrated: ENRG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricENRGSCHD
Expense Ratio0.65%0.06%Best
AUM$37M$111.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%3.24%
Holdings48206
YTD Return+2.23%+29.76%Best
1Y Return-+34.04%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.37%
Top 10 Weight39.6%Best41.6%
Fund FamilyNinepoint Partners LP (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 21, 2026Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ENRG vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ENRG vs SCHD Performance

Ninepoint North American Energy Independence ETF (ENRG) is an ETF from Ninepoint Partners LP (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, ENRG is up 2.23% versus a gain of 29.76% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ENRG charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENRG currently yields 0.00% against 3.24% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

ENRG already in SCHD13.3%
SCHD already in ENRG13.2%

13.3% of ENRG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 13.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings ENRG also owns.

ENRG and SCHD share little of their money.

5 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ENRG and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 48 and 206.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 92 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ENRG (86.6% of the fund), and 18 for ENRG that do not appear in SCHD (49.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ENRGWeight in SCHDDifference
CVXChevron Corp2.70%4.14%1.44%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.012.67%3.91%1.24%
EOGEog Resources Inc2.73%1.91%0.82%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.2.58%1.86%0.72%
DVNDevon Energy Corp.2.67%1.35%1.32%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ENRG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ENRGSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ENRG or SCHD?

ENRG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ENRG and SCHD?

13.3% of ENRG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 13.2% of SCHD's is in holdings ENRG also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ENRG and 98 in SCHD.

Which pays a higher dividend, ENRG or SCHD?

ENRG yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than ENRG?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. ENRG is less concentrated, with 39.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.