EOCT vs IVV
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOCT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $104M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.06% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.34% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
EOCT vs IVV Performance
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EOCT returned +20.34% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, EOCT is up 8.06% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EOCT compounded at +13.85% per year against +21.77% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for EOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for EOCT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOCT charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOCT currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOCT or IVV?
EOCT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOCT or IVV?
Over the past year EOCT returned +20.34% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EOCT annualized +6.86% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOCT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for EOCT. Worst drawdown: EOCT -20.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EOCT and IVV?
EOCT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOCT or IVV?
EOCT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.