EOCT vs IVV
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EOCT or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOCT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $108M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 12 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.87% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.98% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.99% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.07% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,071 | $18,490Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5 years).
EOCT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
EOCT vs IVV Performance
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EOCT returned +14.98% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, EOCT is up 9.87% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, EOCT compounded at +14.99% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.07% and +13.08% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 10.8% for EOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for EOCT and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOCT charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOCT currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EOCT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOCT or IVV?
EOCT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EOCT or IVV?
Over the past year EOCT returned +14.98% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EOCT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 10.8% for EOCT. Worst drawdown: EOCT -20.4% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both EOCT and IVV?
EOCT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOCT or IVV?
EOCT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EOCT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.