EOCT vs QQQ
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EOCT or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOCT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $108M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 12 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +10.12% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.15% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.28% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.11% | +15.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 20.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,098 | $20,324Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5 years).
EOCT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
EOCT vs QQQ Performance
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EOCT returned +15.15% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, EOCT is up 10.12% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, EOCT compounded at +15.28% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.11% and +15.24% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 10.8% for EOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for EOCT and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOCT charges 0.89% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $18 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EOCT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOCT or QQQ?
EOCT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EOCT or QQQ?
Over the past year EOCT returned +15.15% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EOCT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 10.8% for EOCT. Worst drawdown: EOCT -20.4% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EOCT and QQQ?
EOCT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOCT or QQQ?
EOCT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EOCT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.