EOCT vs VXUS
EOCT vs VXUS
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOCT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $104M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.99% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.86% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EOCT vs VXUS Performance
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EOCT returned +19.86% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, EOCT is up 7.99% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, EOCT compounded at +13.43% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, EOCT has the edge at +6.86% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for EOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for EOCT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOCT charges 0.89% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $5 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOCT currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOCT or VXUS?
EOCT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOCT or VXUS?
Over the past year EOCT returned +19.86% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EOCT annualized +6.86% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOCT or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for EOCT. Worst drawdown: EOCT -20.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EOCT and VXUS?
EOCT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOCT or VXUS?
EOCT yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.