EPHE vs IVV
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPHE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $135M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +4.37% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.26% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.71% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.14% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
EPHE vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EPHE returned +0.26% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EPHE is up 4.37% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, EPHE compounded at +3.71% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.14% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPHE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.8% for EPHE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPHE charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPHE currently yields 2.78% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPHE or IVV?
EPHE has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EPHE or IVV?
Over the past year EPHE returned +0.26% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EPHE annualized +0.93% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EPHE or IVV?
EPHE has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EPHE -55.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EPHE and IVV?
EPHE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EPHE and IVV?
EPHE and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPHE or IVV?
EPHE yields 2.78% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EPHE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.