EPHE vs VTI
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPHE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $135M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.45% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.26% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.39% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.13% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
EPHE vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EPHE returned -1.26% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, EPHE is up 3.45% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, EPHE compounded at +3.39% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.13% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPHE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.8% for EPHE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPHE charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPHE currently yields 2.78% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EPHE and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2817 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EPHE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEG | 1.30% | 0.00% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPHE or VTI?
EPHE has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EPHE or VTI?
Over the past year EPHE returned -1.26% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EPHE annualized +0.88% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EPHE or VTI?
EPHE has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EPHE -55.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EPHE and VTI?
EPHE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EPHE and VTI?
EPHE and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2817 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPHE or VTI?
EPHE yields 2.78% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EPHE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.