ESIM vs VXUS

ESIM vs VXUS

Which is better, ESIM or VXUS?

ESIM has been ahead.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. ESIM led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns (1Y): ESIM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricESIMVXUS
Expense Ratio0.59%0.05%Best
AUM$29M$163.2B
Dividend Yield1.44%2.38%
Holdings2329,293
YTD Return+11.48%Best+8.79%
1Y Return+14.69%Best+12.87%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.11%
Fund FamilyEventideVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 17, 2025Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

ESIM vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ESIM vs VXUS Performance

Eventide International ETF (ESIM) is an ETF from Eventide and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ESIM returned +14.69% while VXUS returned +12.87%. Year to date, ESIM is up 11.48% versus a gain of 8.79% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ESIM charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESIM currently yields 1.44% against 2.38% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

ESIM already in VXUS57.0%

At least 57.0% of ESIM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

58 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in ESIM and 8,463 in VXUS, against full books of 232 and 9,293.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ESIMWeight in VXUSDifference
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd6.25%4.24%2.01%
SAMPO:FISampo Oyj-A Shs /Eur/ 0.000000002.33%0.05%2.28%
POW:CAPower Corp Of Canada Common Stock2.18%0.07%2.11%
ABBN:SMAbb Ltd.[Abbn]1.88%0.33%1.55%
HLMA:LNHalma Plc2.05%0.04%2.01%
DBSM:SIDBS Group Holdings Ltd Dbs Group Holdings Ltd1.78%0.27%1.51%
7186:JPConcordia Financial Group, Ltd. Com Stk1.94%0.03%1.91%
VENM:SIVenture Corp Ltd1.88%0.01%1.87%
TRN:MITerna Rete Elettrica Nazionale Spa1.82%0.03%1.79%
SSE:LNSse Plc1.73%0.09%1.64%

57.0% of ESIM is already inside VXUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ESIMVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ESIM or VXUS?

ESIM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ESIM or VXUS?

Over the past year ESIM returned +14.69% vs +12.87% for VXUS, so ESIM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ESIM and VXUS?

At least 57.0% of ESIM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 106 positions we hold weights for in ESIM and 8,463 in VXUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, ESIM or VXUS?

ESIM yields 1.44% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than ESIM?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. ESIM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.