ESPO vs IVV
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ESPO or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ESPO led over 3Y and the full window, IVV over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESPO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $255M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 25 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -7.43% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.80% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.25%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.84% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,274 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.1% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (7.9 years).
ESPO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
ESPO vs IVV Performance
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is an ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ESPO returned -17.80% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ESPO is down 7.43% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, ESPO compounded at +23.25% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.84% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ESPO has the edge at +16.78% annualized vs +14.60%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.0% for ESPO and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESPO charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESPO currently yields 1.31% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
6.7% of ESPO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings ESPO also owns.
ESPO and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ESPO and 505 in IVV, against full books of 25 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ESPO (99.3% of the fund), and 4 for ESPO that do not appear in IVV (22.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESPO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 6.66% | 0.06% | 6.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ESPO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESPO or IVV?
ESPO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESPO or IVV?
Over the past year ESPO returned -17.80% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ESPO annualized +16.78% vs +14.60% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESPO or IVV?
ESPO has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ESPO -51.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ESPO and IVV?
ESPO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESPO and IVV?
6.7% of ESPO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's is in holdings ESPO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ESPO and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESPO or IVV?
ESPO yields 1.31% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ESPO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ESPO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ESPO led over 3Y and the full window, IVV over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.