ESPO vs SCHD
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESPO | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $255M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -4.99% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.90% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.12% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.27% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
ESPO vs SCHD Performance
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is a ETF from VanEck and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ESPO returned -11.90% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, ESPO is down 4.99% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, ESPO compounded at +24.12% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.27% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ESPO has the edge at +17.34% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.0% for ESPO and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESPO charges 0.55% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $6 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESPO currently yields 1.34% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
ESPO and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 124 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESPO or SCHD?
ESPO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ESPO or SCHD?
Over the past year ESPO returned -11.90% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ESPO annualized +17.34% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ESPO or SCHD?
ESPO has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ESPO -51.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ESPO and SCHD?
ESPO and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ESPO and SCHD?
ESPO and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 124 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESPO or SCHD?
ESPO yields 1.34% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.