ESPO vs VOO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ESPO or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ESPO led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESPO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $255M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 25 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -6.71% | +11.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | -18.60% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.34%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.13% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,478 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.4% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2018 to Sep 15, 2026 (7.9 years).
ESPO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
ESPO vs VOO Performance
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ESPO returned -18.60% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, ESPO is down 6.71% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, ESPO compounded at +24.34% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.13% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ESPO has the edge at +16.87% annualized vs +14.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 16.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.0% for ESPO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESPO charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESPO currently yields 1.31% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in ESPO and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.9% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ESPO and 494 in VOO, against full books of 25 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ESPO (99.2% of the fund), and 5 for ESPO that do not appear in VOO (28.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ESPO and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESPO or VOO?
ESPO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESPO or VOO?
Over the past year ESPO returned -18.60% vs +15.94% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ESPO annualized +16.87% vs +14.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESPO or VOO?
ESPO has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 16.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ESPO -51.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ESPO and VOO?
ESPO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESPO or VOO?
ESPO yields 1.31% while VOO yields 1.04%, so ESPO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ESPO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ESPO led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.