ESPO vs VOO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESPO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $255M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -6.37% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.33% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.12% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.25% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ESPO vs VOO Performance
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ESPO returned -11.33% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, ESPO is down 6.37% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, ESPO compounded at +24.12% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.25% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ESPO has the edge at +17.08% annualized vs +13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.0% for ESPO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESPO charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESPO currently yields 1.34% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ESPO and VOO share 1 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESPO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 6.66% | 0.07% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESPO or VOO?
ESPO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ESPO or VOO?
Over the past year ESPO returned -11.33% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ESPO annualized +17.08% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ESPO or VOO?
ESPO has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ESPO -51.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ESPO and VOO?
ESPO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ESPO and VOO?
ESPO and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESPO or VOO?
ESPO yields 1.34% while VOO yields 1.08%, so ESPO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.