ETU vs IVV
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -73.88% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | -90.57% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 158.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -95.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
ETU vs IVV Performance
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF (ETU) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ETU returned -90.57% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ETU is down 73.88% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 158.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.0% for ETU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETU charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETU currently yields 0.01% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ETU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETU or IVV?
ETU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETU or IVV?
Over the past year ETU returned -90.57% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETU annualized -63.47% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETU or IVV?
ETU has been the more volatile fund at 158.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ETU -95.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ETU and IVV?
ETU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETU and IVV?
ETU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETU or IVV?
ETU yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.