ETU vs QQQ
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETU | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $10M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -58.02% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -82.27% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 165.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -95.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ETU vs QQQ Performance
T-REX 2X LONG ETHER DAILY TARGET ETF (ETU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ETU returned -82.27% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, ETU is down 58.02% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 165.1% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.0% for ETU and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETU charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETU currently yields 0.01% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ETU and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETU or QQQ?
ETU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETU or QQQ?
Over the past year ETU returned -82.27% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETU annualized -52.11% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETU or QQQ?
ETU has been the more volatile fund at 165.1% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: ETU -95.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ETU and QQQ?
ETU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETU and QQQ?
ETU and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETU or QQQ?
ETU yields 0.01% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.