ETW vs TLTP
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
TLTP has a lower expense ratio. ETW delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 291 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ETW | TLTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $936M | $25M | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.47% | 15.05% | |
| Holdings | 291 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.70% | -8.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.91% | -6.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.63% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.41% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 8.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -13.3% | |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2005 | Oct 29, 2024 |
ETW vs TLTP Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year ETW returned +20.91% while TLTP returned -6.89%. Year to date, ETW is up 12.70% versus a loss of 8.91% for TLTP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 8.7% for TLTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for ETW and -13.3% for TLTP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ETW charges 1.10% per year while TLTP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $39 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETW currently yields 7.47% against 15.05% for TLTP.
Holdings Overlap
ETW and TLTP share 0 holdings out of 262 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ETW or TLTP?
ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ETW or TLTP?
Over the past year ETW returned +20.91% vs -6.89% for TLTP, so ETW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ETW annualized -1.05% vs -5.03% for TLTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ETW or TLTP?
ETW has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 8.7% for TLTP. Worst drawdown: ETW -72.8% vs TLTP -13.3%.
Should I hold both ETW and TLTP?
ETW and TLTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ETW and TLTP?
ETW and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 262 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ETW or TLTP?
ETW yields 7.47% while TLTP yields 15.05%, so TLTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.