EZM vs QQQ
WisdomTree US MidCap Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EZM or QQQ?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EZM is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EZM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $934M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 508 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.10% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.41% | +22.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.19% | +24.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.70% | +14.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 18.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -60.6% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,176 | $19,586Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.0%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 23, 2007 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.5 years).
EZM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.5 years both funds cover.
EZM vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree US MidCap Fund (EZM) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EZM returned +13.41% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, EZM is up 12.10% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Over three years, EZM compounded at +14.19% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.70% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.35% annualized vs +8.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EZM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.6% for EZM and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EZM charges 0.38% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $18 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EZM currently yields 1.21% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of EZM's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings EZM also owns.
QQQ and EZM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in EZM and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 508 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EZM (94.3% of the fund), and 496 for EZM that do not appear in QQQ (96.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EZM | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 0.06% | 2.78% | 2.72% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EZM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EZM or QQQ?
EZM has an expense ratio of 0.38% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EZM or QQQ?
Over the past year EZM returned +13.41% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EZM annualized +8.38% vs +15.35% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EZM or QQQ?
EZM has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: EZM -60.6% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both EZM and QQQ?
EZM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EZM and QQQ?
2.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings EZM also owns. 2.8% of QQQ's is in holdings EZM also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in EZM and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EZM or QQQ?
EZM yields 1.21% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EZM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EZM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EZM is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.