FAN vs IVV
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FAN or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FAN led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FAN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $242M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 108 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.76% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +27.41%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.44% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.00% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.1% | -49.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,593 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2008 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2008 to Sep 11, 2026 (18.2 years).
FAN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.2 years both funds cover.
FAN vs IVV Performance
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FAN returned +27.41% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, FAN is up 11.76% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, FAN compounded at +17.44% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.00% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +10.49% annualized vs -1.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.1% for FAN and -49.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FAN charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAN currently yields 0.99% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
4.5% of FAN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings FAN also owns.
FAN and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in FAN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 108 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FAN (98.9% of the fund), and 6 for FAN that do not appear in IVV (10.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FAN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FAN or IVV?
FAN has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FAN or IVV?
Over the past year FAN returned +27.41% vs +17.57% for IVV, so FAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), FAN annualized -1.09% vs +10.49% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FAN or IVV?
FAN has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FAN -82.1% vs IVV -49.5%.
Should I hold both FAN and IVV?
FAN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FAN and IVV?
4.5% of FAN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's is in holdings FAN also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in FAN and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FAN or IVV?
FAN yields 0.99% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FAN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FAN led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.