FBT vs SCHD
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FBT or SCHD?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FBT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 5Y. FBT is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBT | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $2.9B | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 62 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +30.43%Best | +27.56% |
| 1Y Return | +55.00%Best | +30.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.22%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.55% | +10.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.5% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,778 | $16,274Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.7%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (14.9 years).
FBT vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
FBT vs SCHD Performance
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund (FBT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FBT returned +55.00% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, FBT is up 30.43% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, FBT compounded at +21.22% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.55% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, FBT has the edge at +15.16% annualized vs +11.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.5% for FBT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBT charges 0.55% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $6 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBT currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
3.7% of FBT's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 4.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings FBT also owns.
SCHD and FBT share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in FBT and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 62 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FBT (95.3% of the fund), and 24 for FBT that do not appear in SCHD (79.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBT | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 3.74% | 4.62% | 0.88% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FBT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBT or SCHD?
FBT has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBT or SCHD?
Over the past year FBT returned +55.00% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so FBT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), FBT annualized +15.16% vs +11.53% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBT or SCHD?
FBT has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FBT -40.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FBT and SCHD?
FBT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FBT and SCHD?
4.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings FBT also owns. 4.6% of SCHD's is in holdings FBT also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in FBT and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBT or SCHD?
FBT yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FBT?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FBT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 5Y. FBT is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.