FBY vs VXUS
FBY vs VXUS
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBY | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $109M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 59.17% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -10.65% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.18% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.47% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FBY vs VXUS Performance
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBY returned -22.18% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FBY is down 10.65% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FBY compounded at +15.47% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, FBY has the edge at +14.34% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.5% for FBY and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBY charges 1.06% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $5 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBY currently yields 59.17% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FBY and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBY or VXUS?
FBY has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBY or VXUS?
Over the past year FBY returned -22.18% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FBY annualized +14.34% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBY or VXUS?
FBY has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FBY -31.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FBY and VXUS?
FBY and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FBY and VXUS?
FBY and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBY or VXUS?
FBY yields 59.17% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so FBY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.