FBZ vs IVV
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.73% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +27.43% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.54% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.18% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.84% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 79.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
FBZ vs IVV Performance
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX Fund (FBZ) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FBZ returned +6.54% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, FBZ is up 27.43% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, FBZ compounded at +13.18% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.84% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs -0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 79.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.5% for FBZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBZ charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBZ currently yields 3.73% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBZ or IVV?
FBZ has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBZ or IVV?
Over the past year FBZ returned +6.54% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FBZ annualized -0.89% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBZ or IVV?
FBZ has been the more volatile fund at 79.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FBZ -87.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FBZ and IVV?
FBZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBZ or IVV?
FBZ yields 3.73% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FBZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.