FBZ vs VOO
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.73% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +27.43% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.54% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.18% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.84% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 79.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 18, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FBZ vs VOO Performance
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX Fund (FBZ) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBZ returned +6.54% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, FBZ is up 27.43% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, FBZ compounded at +13.18% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.84% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs -0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 79.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.5% for FBZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBZ charges 0.80% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBZ currently yields 3.73% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBZ or VOO?
FBZ has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBZ or VOO?
Over the past year FBZ returned +6.54% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), FBZ annualized -0.89% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBZ or VOO?
FBZ has been the more volatile fund at 79.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FBZ -87.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FBZ and VOO?
FBZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBZ or VOO?
FBZ yields 3.73% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FBZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.