FDIF vs IVV
Fidelity Disruptors ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $110M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.20% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.32% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FDIF vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDIF returned +22.32% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, FDIF is up 15.20% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, FDIF compounded at +19.86% per year against +21.47% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDIF has the edge at +17.86% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for FDIF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIF charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIF currently yields 0.26% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FDIF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIF or IVV?
FDIF has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDIF or IVV?
Over the past year FDIF returned +22.32% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDIF annualized +17.86% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDIF or IVV?
FDIF has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FDIF -22.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FDIF and IVV?
FDIF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIF and IVV?
FDIF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIF or IVV?
FDIF yields 0.26% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.