FDRV vs VXUS
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDRV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.60% | +13.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.09% | +25.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.87% | +19.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.92% | +8.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 5, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FDRV vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDRV returned +5.09% while VXUS returned +25.90%. Year to date, FDRV is up 0.60% versus a gain of 13.91% for VXUS.
Over three years, FDRV compounded at -2.87% per year against +19.76% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -7.92% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs -7.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.9% for FDRV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDRV charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRV currently yields 1.31% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FDRV and VXUS share 10 holdings out of 8136 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDRV or VXUS?
FDRV has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDRV or VXUS?
Over the past year FDRV returned +5.09% vs +25.90% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FDRV annualized -7.92% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDRV or VXUS?
FDRV has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FDRV -63.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FDRV and VXUS?
FDRV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDRV and VXUS?
FDRV and VXUS share 10 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8136 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDRV or VXUS?
FDRV yields 1.31% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.