FDRV vs VTI
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FDRV or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDRV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $26M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.34% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 64 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -2.18% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.39% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.13% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.34% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.9% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,470 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 5, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 7, 2021 to Sep 25, 2026 (5 years).
FDRV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
FDRV vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDRV returned -6.39% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, FDRV is down 2.18% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, FDRV compounded at -0.13% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -8.34% and +12.14% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.9% for FDRV and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDRV charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRV currently yields 1.34% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
43.9% of FDRV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's money is in holdings FDRV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FDRV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 64 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FDRV (95.6% of the fund), and 5 for FDRV that do not appear in VTI (9.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDRV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 5.97% | 0.20% | 5.77% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.56% | 1.22% | 3.34% |
| RIVNRivian Automotive | 3.94% | 0.02% | 3.92% |
| LYFTLyft Inc. Class A | 3.59% | 0.01% | 3.58% |
| AURAurora Innovation Inc | 2.94% | 0.01% | 2.93% |
| LEALear Corp. | 2.77% | 0.01% | 2.76% |
| STSensata Technologies Holding Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.56% | 0.01% | 2.55% |
| ALGMAllegro Microsystems, Inc. | 2.06% | 0.01% | 2.05% |
| VCVisteon Corp | 1.91% | 0.00% | 1.91% |
| BLBDBlue Bird Corp | 1.59% | 0.00% | 1.59% |
43.9% of FDRV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDRV or VTI?
FDRV has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDRV or VTI?
Over the past year FDRV returned -6.39% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDRV or VTI?
FDRV has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FDRV -63.9% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both FDRV and VTI?
FDRV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FDRV and VTI?
43.9% of FDRV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's is in holdings FDRV also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FDRV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDRV or VTI?
FDRV yields 1.34% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FDRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FDRV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.