FEBT vs QQQ
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEBT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $158M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.07% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.30% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.84% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FEBT vs QQQ Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FEBT returned +16.30% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, FEBT is up 10.07% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, FEBT compounded at +15.84% per year against +25.79% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, FEBT has the edge at +15.72% annualized vs +13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.3% for FEBT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for FEBT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEBT charges 0.74% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $18 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBT currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEBT or QQQ?
FEBT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEBT or QQQ?
Over the past year FEBT returned +16.30% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FEBT annualized +15.72% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEBT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.3% for FEBT. Worst drawdown: FEBT -13.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FEBT and QQQ?
FEBT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEBT or QQQ?
FEBT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.