FEBT vs VYM

FEBT vs VYM

Which is better, FEBT or VYM?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FEBT led over the full window, VYM over 1Y and 3Y.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEBTVYM
Expense Ratio0.74%0.04%Best
AUM$159M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings5613
YTD Return+10.21%+11.35%Best
1Y Return+14.24%+15.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+16.00%+17.22%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.30%
Volatility (annualized)8.3%Best11.3%
Max Drawdown-13.2%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 3.6 years$16,690Best$15,786
Fund FamilyAllianzIMVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 31, 2023Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.6 years).

FEBT vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.

FEBT vs VYM Performance

AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEBT returned +14.24% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, FEBT is up 10.21% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Over three years, FEBT compounded at +16.00% per year against +17.22% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, FEBT has the edge at +15.29% annualized vs +13.52%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.3% compared with 8.3% for FEBT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for FEBT and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEBT charges 0.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $4 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBT currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FEBT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FEBTVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEBT or VYM?

FEBT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FEBT or VYM?

Over the past year FEBT returned +14.24% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FEBT annualized +15.29% vs +13.52% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FEBT or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 11.3% annualized versus 8.3% for FEBT. Worst drawdown: FEBT -13.2% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both FEBT and VYM?

FEBT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEBT or VYM?

FEBT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than FEBT?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. FEBT led over the full window, VYM over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.