FEBU vs PBFR

FEBU vs PBFR

Which is better, FEBU or PBFR?

FEBU has been ahead.

PBFR has a lower expense ratio. FEBU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: PBFRHigher Returns: FEBU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEBUPBFR
Expense Ratio0.74%0.50%Best
AUM$52M$226M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.01%
Holdings1228
YTD Return+10.21%Best+7.77%
1Y Return+11.31%Best+9.91%
Volatility (annualized)8.6%4.7%Best
Max Drawdown-11.7%-8.5%Best
$10,000 over 1.7 years$12,198Best$11,779
Fund FamilyAllianzIMPGIM Investments
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionJan 31, 2025Jun 11, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2025 to Oct 9, 2026 (1.7 years).

FEBU vs PBFR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

Compare FEBU against instead:FEBU vs SPYFEBU vs QQQFEBU vs VOOFEBU vs VTIPBFR against:PBFR vs VXUS

FEBU vs PBFR Performance

AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) is an ETF from AllianzIM and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year FEBU returned +11.31% while PBFR returned +9.91%. Year to date, FEBU is up 10.21% versus a gain of 7.77% for PBFR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FEBU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.6% compared with 4.7% for PBFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.7% for FEBU and -8.5% for PBFR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEBU charges 0.74% per year while PBFR charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $50 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEBU currently yields 0.00% against 0.01% for PBFR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FEBU and PBFR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FEBUPBFR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEBU or PBFR?

FEBU has an expense ratio of 0.74% while PBFR charges 0.50%. PBFR is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FEBU or PBFR?

Over the past year FEBU returned +11.31% vs +9.91% for PBFR, so FEBU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEBU annualized +12.40% vs +10.11% for PBFR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FEBU or PBFR?

FEBU has been the more volatile fund at 8.6% annualized versus 4.7% for PBFR. Worst drawdown: FEBU -11.7% vs PBFR -8.5%.

Should I hold both FEBU and PBFR?

FEBU and PBFR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEBU or PBFR?

FEBU yields 0.00% while PBFR yields 0.01%, so PBFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PBFR better than FEBU?

PBFR has a lower expense ratio. FEBU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.