FEMR vs VTI
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FEMR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEMR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $167M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 149 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.32% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.51% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
FEMR vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEMR returned +44.51% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, FEMR is up 24.32% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for FEMR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEMR charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMR currently yields 1.55% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FEMR and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2935 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEMR or VTI?
FEMR has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEMR or VTI?
Over the past year FEMR returned +44.51% vs +22.35% for VTI, so FEMR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEMR annualized +35.29% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEMR or VTI?
FEMR has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FEMR -15.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FEMR and VTI?
FEMR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEMR and VTI?
FEMR and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2935 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEMR or VTI?
FEMR yields 1.55% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FEMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.