FEMR vs VOO
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FEMR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEMR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $167M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 149 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +24.32% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.51% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FEMR vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEMR returned +44.51% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, FEMR is up 24.32% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for FEMR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEMR charges 0.38% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMR currently yields 1.55% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FEMR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 653 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEMR or VOO?
FEMR has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEMR or VOO?
Over the past year FEMR returned +44.51% vs +21.87% for VOO, so FEMR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FEMR annualized +35.29% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEMR or VOO?
FEMR has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FEMR -15.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FEMR and VOO?
FEMR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEMR and VOO?
FEMR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 653 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEMR or VOO?
FEMR yields 1.55% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FEMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.