FEZ vs VTI
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.5B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.47% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.99% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.55% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.17% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2002 | May 24, 2001 |
FEZ vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEZ returned +20.99% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, FEZ is up 11.47% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, FEZ compounded at +20.55% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.17% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 24-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.2% for FEZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEZ charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEZ currently yields 2.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FEZ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2835 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEZ or VTI?
FEZ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEZ or VTI?
Over the past year FEZ returned +20.99% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (24 years), FEZ annualized +5.22% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEZ or VTI?
FEZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FEZ -66.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FEZ and VTI?
FEZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEZ and VTI?
FEZ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2835 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEZ or VTI?
FEZ yields 2.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.