FEZ vs VXUS
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $4.3B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +12.15% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.68% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.83% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.58% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2002 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FEZ vs VXUS Performance
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEZ returned +22.68% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, FEZ is up 12.15% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, FEZ compounded at +19.83% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.58% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, FEZ has the edge at +5.25% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.2% for FEZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEZ charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEZ currently yields 2.59% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FEZ and VXUS share 30 holdings out of 7881 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEZ or VXUS?
FEZ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEZ or VXUS?
Over the past year FEZ returned +22.68% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), FEZ annualized +5.25% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEZ or VXUS?
FEZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FEZ -66.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FEZ and VXUS?
FEZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FEZ and VXUS?
FEZ and VXUS share 30 common holdings with a 7.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7881 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEZ or VXUS?
FEZ yields 2.59% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.