FEZ vs VOO
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FEZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.3B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.15% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.68% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.83% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.58% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2002 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FEZ vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FEZ returned +22.68% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, FEZ is up 12.15% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, FEZ compounded at +19.83% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.58% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FEZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.2% for FEZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEZ charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEZ currently yields 2.59% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FEZ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEZ or VOO?
FEZ has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FEZ or VOO?
Over the past year FEZ returned +22.68% vs +22.02% for VOO, so FEZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), FEZ annualized +5.25% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FEZ or VOO?
FEZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FEZ -66.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FEZ and VOO?
FEZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FEZ and VOO?
FEZ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEZ or VOO?
FEZ yields 2.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.