FFLC vs FIFT
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF vs HCM Select 50 ETF
Which is better, FFLC or FIFT?
FFLC costs less.
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLC | FIFT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 1.35% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $67M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 337 | 50 |
| YTD Price Return | +7.65% | - |
| 1Y Price Return | +10.93% | - |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | +19.05% | - |
| 5Y Price Return (annualized) | +13.92% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.3% | 21.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Howard Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Oct 21, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FIFT. We have no price series for FIFT, so there is nothing to compare it against. FFLC yields 1.03% and FIFT 0.00% on top.
FFLC vs FIFT Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and HCM Select 50 ETF (FIFT) is an ETF from Howard Capital Management.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLC charges 0.38% per year while FIFT charges 1.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $135 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLC currently yields 1.03% against 0.00% for FIFT.
Holdings Overlap
2.5% of FFLC's money is in holdings FIFT also owns. 10.4% of FIFT's money is in holdings FFLC also owns.
FIFT and FFLC share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 109 positions we hold weights for in FFLC and 50 in FIFT, against full books of 337 and 50.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 109 and 50 positions we hold weights for.
FFLC holds 96 positions FIFT does not, 91.7% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.31%, MSFT 6.22%, GOOGL 5.18%, AMZN 4.80%, AAPL 4.75%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFLC and FIFT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLC or FIFT?
FFLC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while FIFT charges 1.35%. FFLC is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLC and FIFT?
10.4% of FIFT's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 10.4% of FIFT's is in holdings FFLC also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 109 positions we hold weights for in FFLC and 50 in FIFT.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLC or FIFT?
FFLC yields 1.03% while FIFT yields 0.00%, so FFLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FIFT better than FFLC?
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. FIFT is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.