FFLV vs IG
FFLV vs IG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 145 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | IG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $16M | $198M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 5.07% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 248 | |
| YTD Return | +17.97% | -1.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.15% | +0.84% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -23.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Principal Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Apr 18, 2018 |
FFLV vs IG Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF (IG) is a ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year FFLV returned +32.15% while IG returned +0.84%. Year to date, FFLV is up 17.97% versus a loss of 1.54% for IG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 8.0% for IG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -23.8% for IG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while IG charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $19 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.41% against 5.07% for IG.
Holdings Overlap
FFLV and IG share 0 holdings out of 250 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or IG?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IG charges 0.19%. IG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLV or IG?
Over the past year FFLV returned +32.15% vs +0.84% for IG, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLV annualized +17.62% vs +0.59% for IG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLV or IG?
FFLV has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 8.0% for IG. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs IG -23.8%.
Should I hold both FFLV and IG?
FFLV and IG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and IG?
FFLV and IG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 250 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or IG?
FFLV yields 1.41% while IG yields 5.07%, so IG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.