FHIL vs VTI

FHIL vs VTI

Which is better, FHIL or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FHIL is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: FHIL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFHILVTI
Expense Ratio0.48%0.03%Best
AUM$3M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings2373,524
YTD Return-3.34%+13.35%Best
1Y Return-+15.92%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.83%
Top 10 Weight23.9%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyFederated HermesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 17, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FHIL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FHIL vs VTI Performance

Federated Hermes International Leaders ETF (FHIL) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FHIL is down 3.34% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FHIL charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FHIL currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

FHIL already in VTI1.9%
VTI already in FHIL0.1%

1.9% of FHIL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings FHIL also owns.

FHIL and VTI share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FHIL as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

3 positions in common, counted across the 77 positions we hold weights for in FHIL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 237 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FHIL (97.4% of the fund), and 8 for FHIL that do not appear in VTI (12.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FHILWeight in VTIDifference
CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common0.86%0.09%0.77%
HALHalliburton Co.0.61%0.03%0.58%
RIG:SMTransocean Ltd Common Stock0.47%0.01%0.46%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FHIL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FHILVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FHIL or VTI?

FHIL has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FHIL and VTI?

1.9% of FHIL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings FHIL also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 77 positions we hold weights for in FHIL and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, FHIL or VTI?

FHIL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FHIL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FHIL is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.