FHIL vs VYM
Federated Hermes International Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FHIL or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FHIL is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FHIL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 92 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -4.31% | +9.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.45% |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.6%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 17, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FHIL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FHIL vs VYM Performance
Federated Hermes International Leaders ETF (FHIL) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FHIL is down 4.31% versus a gain of 9.71% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FHIL charges 0.48% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $4 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FHIL currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of FHIL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.5% of VYM's money is in holdings FHIL also owns.
FHIL and VYM share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in FHIL and 557 in VYM, against full books of 92 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FHIL (97.0% of the fund), and 9 for FHIL that do not appear in VYM (11.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FHIL and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FHIL or VYM?
FHIL has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FHIL and VYM?
2.0% of FHIL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.5% of VYM's is in holdings FHIL also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in FHIL and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FHIL or VYM?
FHIL yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FHIL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FHIL is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.