FHIL vs SCHD
Federated Hermes International Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FHIL or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FHIL is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FHIL | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 92 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -0.22% | +26.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +30.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.95% |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.6%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 17, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FHIL vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FHIL vs SCHD Performance
Federated Hermes International Leaders ETF (FHIL) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, FHIL is down 0.22% versus a gain of 26.13% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FHIL charges 0.48% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $6 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FHIL currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 84 holdings in FHIL and 100 in SCHD, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in FHIL and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 92 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FHIL (99.7% of the fund), and 15 for FHIL that do not appear in SCHD (16.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FHIL and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FHIL or SCHD?
FHIL has an expense ratio of 0.48% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FHIL or SCHD?
FHIL yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FHIL?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FHIL is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.