FIVA vs VOO
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FIVA or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FIVA led over 1Y and 5Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. FIVA is less concentrated, with 15.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIVA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $587M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.54% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 113 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.94%Best | +13.31% |
| 1Y Return | +26.51%Best | +17.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.50% | +22.72%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.48%Best | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,819Best | $18,580 |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.4%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 18, 2018 to Sep 23, 2026 (8.7 years).
FIVA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
FIVA vs VOO Performance
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FIVA returned +26.51% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, FIVA is up 13.94% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, FIVA compounded at +22.50% per year against +22.72% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.48% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +7.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FIVA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for FIVA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIVA charges 0.18% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIVA currently yields 2.54% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 108 holdings in FIVA and 494 in VOO, totalling 97.8% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 108 positions we hold weights for in FIVA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 113 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FIVA (99.2% of the fund), and 4 for FIVA that do not appear in VOO (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FIVA and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIVA or VOO?
FIVA has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FIVA or VOO?
Over the past year FIVA returned +26.51% vs +17.07% for VOO, so FIVA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FIVA annualized +7.43% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FIVA or VOO?
FIVA has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FIVA -44.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FIVA and VOO?
FIVA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIVA or VOO?
FIVA yields 2.54% while VOO yields 1.04%, so FIVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FIVA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FIVA led over 1Y and 5Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. FIVA is less concentrated, with 15.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.