FLCA vs SPY
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
FLCA has a lower expense ratio. FLCA delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLCA | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $863M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +15.32% | +13.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.95% | +21.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.11% | +22.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.56% | +13.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Jan 22, 1993 |
FLCA vs SPY Performance
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year FLCA returned +32.95% while SPY returned +21.44%. Year to date, FLCA is up 15.32% versus a gain of 13.70% for SPY.
Over three years, FLCA compounded at +25.11% per year against +22.50% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +13.56% and +13.24% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLCA has the edge at +11.00% annualized vs +8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLCA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for FLCA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLCA charges 0.09% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $9 annually, a gap of $0 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLCA currently yields 1.74% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
FLCA and SPY share 0 holdings out of 590 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLCA or SPY?
FLCA has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SPY charges 0.09%. FLCA is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLCA or SPY?
Over the past year FLCA returned +32.95% vs +21.44% for SPY, so FLCA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLCA annualized +11.00% vs +8.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLCA or SPY?
FLCA has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: FLCA -41.5% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both FLCA and SPY?
FLCA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLCA and SPY?
FLCA and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 590 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLCA or SPY?
FLCA yields 1.74% while SPY yields 1.01%, so FLCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.