FLDR vs VXUS
FLDR vs VXUS
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLDR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.69% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 361 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.33% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.31% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.32% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.18% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FLDR vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLDR returned +1.31% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FLDR is down 0.33% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FLDR compounded at +4.32% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.18% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.1% for FLDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.2% for FLDR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLDR charges 0.15% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $5 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDR currently yields 4.69% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FLDR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8160 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLDR or VXUS?
FLDR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLDR or VXUS?
Over the past year FLDR returned +1.31% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FLDR annualized +2.87% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLDR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.1% for FLDR. Worst drawdown: FLDR -12.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FLDR and VXUS?
FLDR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLDR and VXUS?
FLDR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8160 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLDR or VXUS?
FLDR yields 4.69% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so FLDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.