FLGB vs VYM
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGB | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $933M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.85% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.69% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.68% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.70% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLGB vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLGB returned +21.69% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, FLGB is up 11.24% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, FLGB compounded at +20.68% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.70% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLGB has the edge at +7.12% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.6% for FLGB and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGB charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGB currently yields 2.85% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLGB and VYM share 0 holdings out of 699 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGB or VYM?
FLGB has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGB or VYM?
Over the past year FLGB returned +21.69% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGB annualized +7.12% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGB or VYM?
FLGB has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLGB -46.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLGB and VYM?
FLGB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGB and VYM?
FLGB and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 699 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGB or VYM?
FLGB yields 2.85% while VYM yields 2.24%, so FLGB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.