FLGB vs VOO
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLGB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLGB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $933M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.85% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.69% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.68% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.70% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLGB vs VOO Performance
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLGB returned +21.69% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, FLGB is up 11.24% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, FLGB compounded at +20.68% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.70% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLGB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.6% for FLGB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLGB charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLGB currently yields 2.85% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLGB and VOO share 0 holdings out of 601 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLGB or VOO?
FLGB has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLGB or VOO?
Over the past year FLGB returned +21.69% vs +21.62% for VOO, so FLGB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLGB annualized +7.12% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLGB or VOO?
FLGB has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLGB -46.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLGB and VOO?
FLGB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLGB and VOO?
FLGB and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 601 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLGB or VOO?
FLGB yields 2.85% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLGB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.