FLLA vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLLA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLLA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $105M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.70% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 138 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +10.23% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.69% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.60% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.12% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 9, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLLA vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLLA returned +30.69% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, FLLA is up 10.23% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, FLLA compounded at +12.60% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.12% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLLA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for FLLA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLLA charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLLA currently yields 4.70% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLLA and VYM share 0 holdings out of 729 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLLA or VYM?
FLLA has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLLA or VYM?
Over the past year FLLA returned +30.69% vs +22.16% for VYM, so FLLA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FLLA annualized +5.93% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLLA or VYM?
FLLA has been the more volatile fund at 27.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLLA -53.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLLA and VYM?
FLLA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLLA and VYM?
FLLA and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 729 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLLA or VYM?
FLLA yields 4.70% while VYM yields 2.24%, so FLLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.